How you define and exercise leadership in the present climate will be a significant determinant in your organisation's fortunes
Let’s define leadership: Leadership is the process by which a person influences others to accomplish an objective.
Leaders have a vision that they share with others. It is the leader who binds the organization together with beliefs, values and knowledge and who makes it more cohesive and coherent. We can also define leadership as a process that motivates people to excel in the field in which they are working.
Can leadership be taught?
Many would say that leadership qualities are not inborn but can be developed gradually through education and self-study. Personally I am not so sure about this.
The current assumption is that leadership can be taught. There are very many courses, seminars and books on leadership and a big demand for training to develop leadership skills.
How one sees the role of a leader and applies those theories to his or her career will ultimately decide the type of leader they will become. This vision is shaped through years of influence, sometimes from a school or program like a Bachelor of Science in Leadership. For more information on such a program click here.
On the basis of my life experience and as I define leadership - it is my view that you can most effectively teach leadership skills to someone who has the latent [and maybe unrecognized and unacknowledged] potential to be a leader.
Management skills can be taught to just about anyone of at least average intelligence and education [and in saying that I am not denigrating management]. However, a brief review of the differences between leadership and management suggests that leadership owes as least as much to "nature" as it does to "nurture".
In my experience of attempting to define leadership and of observing leaders in action- the vast majority of people are followers and not leaders and very happy to remain so. Leaders are a very small percentage of the population maybe less than 1% and really strong leaders with the potential to really change things [for better or worse] probably less than 0.1%.
Again, in my experience, most people would far rather be led than lead.
I am impressed with what Peter Drucker had to say in an interview he gave a few years ago when he was asked to define leadership:
Peter Drucker: "Successful leaders ask 'what needs to be done?' "
"Successful leaders don't start out asking, 'What do I want to do?' They ask, 'What needs to be done?' Then they ask, 'Of those things that would make a difference, which are right for me?' They don't tackle things they aren't good at. They make sure other necessities get done, but not by them. Successful leaders make sure that they succeed! They are not afraid of strength in others.
Leaders communicate in the sense that people around them know what they are trying to do. They are purpose driven - yes, mission driven. They know how to establish a mission.
You know, I was the first one to talk about leadership 50 years ago, but there is too much talk, too much emphasis on it today and not enough on effectiveness.
"A leader has followers..."
The only thing you can say about a leader is that a leader is somebody who has followers.
Look, one of the most effective American presidents of the last 100 years was Harry Truman. He didn't have an ounce of charisma. Truman was as bland as a dead mackerel. Everybody who worked for him worshiped him because he was absolutely trustworthy. If Truman said no, it was no, and if he said yes, it was yes. And he didn't say no to one person and yes to the next one on the same issue.
The other effective president of the last 100 years was Ronald Reagan. His great strength was not charisma, as is commonly thought, but that he knew exactly what he could do and what he could not do.
We have talked a lot about executive development. We have been mostly talking about developing people's strength and giving them experiences.
"Character is developed inside out..."
Character is not developed that way. That is developed inside and not outside. I think churches and synagogues and the 12-step recovery programs are the main development agents of character today.
Your leadership - determining your company's fortunes
As we attempt to define leadership in practise in this section, we are going to look in a little more depth at some of the key theories, and especially the work of James Mcgregor Burns and Bernard Bass on
Transformational Leadership theory,
and that of Hersey and Blanchard on
and the more recent work of Daniel Goleman [the proponent of emotional intelligence] on
How we define leadership, how we understand it and how we exercise it, is of paramount importance in the current economic and business climate as the quality of your leadership could be a major factor in determining your company's fortunes.
What makes a great leader?
An interesting perspective on "What is Leadership?" by leadership and personal development guru Robin Sharma.
Highly recommended additional resources
I recommend each of the following 4 reports as informed expert background reading:
- The Philosophy of Leadership Informed by the Science of Complexity, Chaos, and Quantum Physics
Each of these links will take you to a page with further specific information on major and relevant Leadership Theory and attempts to define leadership.
In the pages that follow, we are going to explore some of these leadership theories in more depth and attempt to define leadership in the light of these theories, and to assess their relevance and application to the whole business of change management. [They are presented largely in chronological order, reflecting the evolving thought and understanding of leadership.]