# The current UK status of managing change in the workplace
I appreciate that 70% of the visitors to this site are non-UK, however I sense that many of the issues we face here in the UK may be shared to some extent in other countries and cultures.
The current state of managing change in the workplace and change leadership in UK businesses is currently reactive to issues that show up on the board’s radar rather than driven by strategic intent and innovation.
This, and the following observations, are based on analysis of recent surveys and supported by my own research and experiences.
Currently the UK top three drivers for change are:
Essentially this is all about stripping out cost rather than innovation to create added customer value.
All the evidence shows that UK change programmes are frequently badly thought out, managing change in the workplace is poorly executed and many do not succeed in achieving their stated objectives. The responsibility for this lies predominantly with the directors and senior management.
This relects the UK business culture of “short-termism” where the focus is on monthly and quarterly targets.
Change is imposed from the top-down
Given that these are change programmes that will have a direct and probably negative impact on employees - with possible job losses, and that the remaining staff will be expected to do more and work harder – they are understandably viewed with suspicion and concern across the organisation.
The prevalence of the centralised "command control" management structure, with the attendant distancing of senior executives from the frontline and thus the personal impacts of their decisions means that those on the receiving end are invariably resistant and resentful.
In addition to the lack of empathy of the impacts of these decisions, directors and senior managers sacrifice the needs and feelings of their employees in the interests of keeping their shareholders happy.
The research shows that 40% of the biggest mistakes in change in UK companies is directly related to the people issues arising from failures and weaknesses displayed in the behaviour of senior managers.
Negative assessment of the role of senior management
This short sightedness is ultimately counterproductive because if change programmes are badly handled – as so many are – then the chance of failure is greater. Furthermore, they can cause more damage to the morale of the company, and thus have a negative effect on future competitiveness.
Research shows a negative assessment of the role senior management play in helping to achieve the end goals of change initiatives. More than 50% feel that senior management fail specifically in inspiring the workforce, managing change in the workplace and providing effective leadership.
The evidence suggests that senior executives lack basic understanding of the aims of business transformation initiatives and specifically their roles as sponsors; and also are lacking in many of the core skills expected of leaders and that are vital for the implementation of change.
Yet despite this, there is a widely shared belief that good executive sponsorship is key in helping a change programme to deliver competitive advantage to a business.
The tide has turned against the major management consultancies
Despite the fact the “change industry” is a multi-billion pound business for UK consultancies, the tide has finally turned against the major blue-chip management consultancies, in terms of perception of “value for money”.
The majority of businesses planning a major change programme prefer to use their own internal resource, or drafting in experts to either fill knowledge gaps or manage the entire process if required.
In summary, research findings indicate that all too often, UK companies embark upon change on a reactive and “knee-jerk” basis to protect them, rather than with desire to innovate and improve.
The tragic result of all this is that too many UK change initiatives suffer from a lack of vision, bad management skills and are generally under resourced, which leads to a poor reception from workers and ultimately a large number of failed programmes. What's your experience - in your company, country or culture?
One excellent research survey "The Challenge of Change" was conducted by UK based Executives Online and was compiled using research conducted amongst almost 200 businesses from across the UK, questioning senior managers responsible for change or business transformation programmes, and more than 400 interim managers.
# 4 key steps to incremental change
In managing change in the workplace it is extremely important to draw the distinction between incremental change and step change.
Whilst the broad principles of leading and managing change in the workplace are universal it is very important to establish very early on whether or not what you are proposing can be regarded as incremental change and realistically can be accomplished within the constraints of business as usual, or not.
If it can not be accomplished within business as usual, then it is a "step change" and needs to be handled as a specific initiative - with the appropriate level of senior sponsorship and practical support of a structured programme management based process.
The bulk of the content of this site addresses "step change" - i.e. change which needs to be handled outside of the constraints of business as usual. For an overview of the key aspects of "step change" covered in this site I refer you to:
Given that the single biggest reason for the astonishingly high 70% failure rate of ALL business change initiatives has been the over-emphasis on process rather than people coupled with the failure to take full account of the impact of change on those people who are most impacted by it. So clearly the approach that I am recommending has to address this with processes that work for people.
Here are the 4 key steps to managing incremental change in the workplace:
(1) Clarity in all areas
(2) Consistent leadership
Change management guru John Kotter
suggests that in successfully managing change in the workplace, 75% of a company's management needs to "buy into" the change. So convincing people that the change is necessary is extremely important.
This will require strong leadership and visible support from key people within your organization. Managing change isn't enough - you have to lead it.
So managing change in the workplace also requires leadership that is visible and leadership that is consistent in all aspects of the way in which you lead the change as well as how you manage the situation, handle the communication, and ensure the realisation of the benefits of the change.
Addressing the emotional impacts of your change
The single biggest aspect of your leadership will be how you address the emotional rather than the rational aspects of the change.
Many thought leaders are now speaking about the criticality of the human dimension of leadership and management of change in the workplace
Leadership thought leader and management guru William Bridges [who focuses on the emotional and psychological impact and the transition aspects of change] offers these 3 simple questions:
(1) What is changing?
Put together a short clear statement of under 60 seconds duration that summarises why the change is necessary and your intentions – what organisational benefit you hope to realise.
(2) What will actually be different because of the change?
Tell them exactly and precisely where and how things will be different after the change.
(3) Who's going to lose what?
Don’t “gloss over” or attempt to minimise or trivialise what they will lose and have to let go of. Be direct, honest and empathic in your truthful recognition of what the impact of your change will mean for them.
You will gain more respect and minimise mistrust by being truthful. This prepares the ground for the practical hands on aspects of managing change in the workplace and specifically the support that you will be providing to translate your “change concept” into a tangible organisational benefit.
You can never “over communicate” in leading and managing change in the workplace and especially with regard to what is happening or not happening and why.
This is also a communication process that listens actively and demonstrates to people that you have thought through the impacts of the change on them, and that you are prepared to work with them through the transition of managing change in the workplace, and that you will help make it work for them.
In terms of the emotional resonance aspect of your communications, remember Martin Luther King who did not stand up in front of the Lincoln Memorial and say:
"I have a great strategy" and illustrate it with 10 good reasons why it was a good strategy. He said those immortal words: "I have a dream," and then he proceeded to show the people what his dream was - he illustrated his picture of the future and did so in a way that had high emotional impact.
Incremental change = translating vision and strategy into actionable steps
As leader of the change, you now face the equally if not more difficult challenge of getting the staff to deliver your new change idea and achieve the organisational benefits that you anticipate.
The reality is that people are very different in the ways they process information, interpret life, and in the ways they are motivated. Many (probably most) of them are not able to make the leap from hearing and understanding your vision and strategy to translating that into purposeful productive action.
This does not mean that they don't understand it, or agree with it, but it does simply mean that the leap is too great for most people to make - without practical assistance.
Getting things done
"It's just about setting out in a logical way, day after day, to do the things you know need to be done to make the customer feel good. It's not sophisticated and it's not complicated, but it's amazing how often it doesn't happen." Sir Gerry Robinson