The trait theory of leadership is the view that people are born with inherited traits - and that some traits are particularly suited to leadership.
Early research on leadership - which was a development of the Great man theory of leadership - was based on the psychological focus of the day, which was of people having inherited characteristics or traits.
Attention was thus put on identifying these traits, often by studying successful leaders. The focus was not [as it today] on finding way of teaching these "skills" to people to "develop" leaders, but was on finding other people with these traits who could also become great leaders.
Trait theory of leadership identifies the following traits and skills as critical to leaders [Stogdill 1974]:
Traits
Adaptable to situations
Alert to social environment
Ambitious and achievement-orientated
Assertive
Cooperative
Decisive
Dependable
Dominant (desire to influence others)
Energetic (high activity level)
Persistent
Self-confident
Tolerant of stress
Willing to assume responsibility
Skills
Clever (intelligent)
Conceptually skilled
Creative
Diplomatic and tactful
Fluent in speaking
Knowledgeable about group task
Organised (administrative ability)
Persuasive
Socially skilled
Four primary traits by which leaders could succeed or fail were identified by McCall and Lombardo [1983]:
Emotional stability
- centred, confident, predictable - especially under stress
Admitting mistakes
- rather than wasting energy evading discovery
Good interpersonal skills
- ability to persuade others
Intellectual ability
- to understand the wider holistic perpective
Changing views
For many years it has been fashionable to assume that inherited traits were far less important than learned and situational factors in those people fulfilling leadership roles.
However, the science and study of behavioural genetics is gradually refocusing attention on the fact that far more is to do with our genes and our inherited traits and characteristics than has been assumed or accepted for several decades.
Leading your people through change, putting it all together and managing the whole messy business
By convention we speak of change “management” but the reality is that change involves leadership as well as management. The primary causes of failure in change initiatives are all people related, and to do with emotions. So [not withstanding the merits or demerits of the trait theory of leadership] change leadership requires some very special qualities in the person[s] leading the change.
This is more to do with “being” than “doing”. What you do, and how you do it will be largely determined by how you are as a person.
Change is an emotional business. The failure to address the human impacts of change is at the root of most failed change initiatives. It is not enough just to “manage” change; people need to be led through change.
Change is a messy business fraught with complexity, multiple factors and many things that can, and usually do, go wrong. There are 3 broad areas that need to be included in any successful change initiative, namely:
Leadership that directly addresses the transitions and emotional dimension of those impacted by the change, and provides inspirational motivation
A change model and methodology that covers the multiple factors that must be addressed
Action management that shows and assists people with the specifics of exactly what is required of them
These are addressed in the "Practitioners Masterclass" which takes a holistic view of the key areas and shows you how to put all this into practise.
And all of this is examined, co-related and integrated with the other key areas leading your people through change, putting it all together and managing the whole messy business.
To equip yourself, stay one step ahead with the tools and processes that will enable you to manage the messy stuff - check out the Practitioners' Masterclass [or click on the image to the right].